The NTSB has a lot that they would like to address in the name
of safety and it is not all aviation related. However there are two
aspects of their 2013 "most wanted" list that are very applicable to
aviation. One of them is the identification and communication of
hazardous weather in general aviation. The other is distractions in all
form of transportation--including aviation. In the issue of the
distraction it sites an accident in which a medical helicopter crashed in
Missouri on Aug 26th, 2011. The crash occurred because the helicopter ran
out of fuel and "The pilot, James Freudenbert, 34, of Rapid City, S.D.,exchanged 20 text messages, over a span of less than two hours preceding thehelicopter crash, documents made public by NTSB show."
While I do feel that distractions in the cockpit is an issue
that needs to be addressed, I think this again is victim of slight overhype. It
seems we like to pick and choose what distractions are acceptable and with at
ones are not. Aviation is a field littered with distraction. While flying the
plane you need to constantly be checking your location, possibly communicating
with others, looking for other traffic--all things that could distract you from
holding your altitude and heading. We do, however, learn to adapt those
distractions and incorporate them. I feel the accident sited is just a poor
example. The text messages were sent prior to the actual flight.
Presumably during the pre-flight checklist and it is being argued that because
of the text messaging is why the pilot did not check the fuel. The NTSB says
"personal electronic devices", or "PEDs" was the cause of
this distraction. For this case in particular, that may have been the
case. But if the pilot had needed to use the restroom quickly during his
pre-flight and when he returned he had mentally skipped over that step in the
checklist? Would we ban using restroom facilities prior to a flight? What
if he was going through the pre-flight checklist the pilot's supervisor
had called out to him to ask him a question? Would we then have to make an
effort to ban speaking when performing a pre-flight checklist?
Distractions of any kind can be bad and I feel that PEDs are
being used as the primary scape goat. My mother was I a debilitating car
accident that made it so she was never able to walk again. The accident
was cause because she flicked the ash off her cigarette (back when actual
cigarette trays were in the car) and looked down the speedometer. Should
smoking while driving and checking your speed be outlawed? Instead of taking an
effort to ban all kind of distraction we should be training people to adapt to
them and work around them--just like we do in all other aspects of aviation
distraction. No one ever says that unfolding a sectional chart could be a
distraction, instead we say to in operate that distractions into your flying.
Haven't we lerned yet that elimination doesn’t seem to increase safety, but
adaptation does?
From a career standpoint I'm not entirely sure that a new job
positions could be created in eliminating distractions in and of themselves. I
suppose a software could be developed to lock out personal texting when
activated by the pilot during pre flight so that he would not miss anything
during the preflight. But that would still require the pilot to activate the
program. You could have someone inspect the pilot as he inspected the
plane to be sure he wasn't distracted, but again, existing personal could
always already do that and would that inspector also tell at the
pilot's supervisor if he called out to him?
There is room, however, for education. I
think PEDs have the potential to do more good than harm. Perhaps
instead of using paper checklists have an electronic checklist as an app that a
pilot can use on their PED. When activated it could potentially lock out
personal text messages, but, more importantly the pilot would have to tap the
item checked after it was checked--maybe changing the color of a checklist from
red to blue? This way if a distraction--any distraction--occurred and the pilot
was momentarily taken away from a checklist, when he would look back at the app
he could say "oh, the fuel is still red. I haven't checked that yet.
I should check that." Job opportunities could be put toward
creating such a software and then possible seminars to ensure the proper
teaching of caption and application to the app. Distractions are going to occur
all the time. Rather than eliminate them, I feel we should work around
them.