Landing at the wrong airport is obviously not something to be
taken lightly. Not because of the mistake itself--oftentimes these
mistakes have no threat to the cargo or passengers on board and result in a
safe landing. The part that makes it a concern is the implications that
pilots may not be aware of what's going on. As pilots, we are taught to have a
very good situational awareness. Landing
at an airport demonstrates a complete lack of situational awareness—and that’s
the main concern. The two incidents already discussed--both the Dreamlifter and
747--are the most pro dominant, but this is not the first time this has
happened. On Sept 7th, 2011, Continental Connections flight 3222 was
inbound for a destination of Lake Charles, LA. It landed at the wrong airport
that was eight miles away.
Some of the hazards of this kind of
mistake are very obvious. Others, not so obvious. In this
incident--and those mentioned earlier--no harm was done to passengers or the
cargo. If everything goes well, when landing at the wrong airport there is no
damage done. There are the obvious problematic implications; that the
runway may not longer be enough for takeoff, or possible fuel problems that may
occur if a plane needed to make another takeoff or landing. The less obvious
implications, I think, are more regulatory ones. What if that additional
landing would put the pilots over their rest requirements? Could the pilot
landing at the wrong airport be a sign that the pilot is already fatigued and
shouldn't be flying anyway? It also adds another landing and takeoff to
keep in mind in oncoming up to the next inspection.
Of course, there are reasons for mistakes. There are reasons
for every mistake in every field. And every mistake in every field can always
be attributed to an error somewhere. And, in a perfect world, those mistakes
can always be avoided. But this isn't a perfect world. We, as humans, in any
field are going to make mistakes. I don't know...maybe I just don't think like
a lawyer like most of this country does. However, I do believe incidents like
this aren't as big of a deal as their made out to me. Don't misunderstand
me, landing at the wrong airport IS a mistake and corrective actions should be
taken, however I do feel as thought he media has taken these more recent events
and blown them a tad out of proportion.
A google search of "airplane lands at the wrong
airport" yields dozens of the same result. It takes a little bit of
playing with the words to find other incidents--and there are other incidents--of
Commercial aviation making a meatier mistakes. While these incidents are not
entirely isolated, they are very overhyped in the media, it would seem.
And a little bit of circumstance should be taken into consideration when
evaluating these incidents. Even in the article Al Yuman explains that with regionals they may be
working the same amount of hours but have more takeoffs and landings. I
would be interested in a survey conducted on percentages comparing regional and
major mistakes. If you are doing something more often, there is more room for
error than if a task is only being performed once in a shift.
But even though these incidents aren't entirely isolated, that
also does not mean there should be no ramification when the mistake is made.
In the case on Sept 7th, 2011, the pilots were both suspended, but with
pay. I do feel that is a fair disciplinary action, Largely because
it accepts that safety was not compromised, but that some things need to be
evaluated to ensure this does not happen again. To me, this shows a company
willing to he improve their employees and their customer service--too learn
from their mistakes--rather than discard them.
Aviation is a field that is constantly changing and should
itself be constantly improving. Moving forward is to get away from the
mentality of "cut off the hand of a thief" and instead teach the
thieves to not steal. There will always be mistakes. It is part of what
makes us human. As long as we retain that humanity--the essence as a
species--we need to accept that these mistakes will happen, and perhaps review
the consequence on an individual basis and come with ways to correct it in the
future. Instead of overdramatizing the mistakes, and making people feel
as if certain aspects of aviation are not, accept that mistakes will happen and
move forward!
Allons-y!
I completely agree that incidents are being over-hyped by the media. That's the age we live in unfortunately, they'll make anything sound worse than it is to sell more papers and get more viewers. I also agree that incidents need to be looked at in a per case basis, but that there are more safety/communications issues at stake even though most incidents have been without major injury so far. Landing at the wrong airport brings issues of terrain that pilots aren't prepared for, highly increased chances of collisions, and questions of ATC and pilot competency. True ATC isn't as much to blame as the pilot, but at some point between radar and communication I would think there should have been some recognition on their part that the pilot was making a mistake.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree with you about the pilots being suspended, but with pay. If a company completely gets rid of an employee or employees because of a mistake such as this, that could really ruin the trust that the other employees have with their operation. While there is very little room for error in the aviation world, especially for pilots, if employees witness one or some of their own be terminated for making such an offense of a slight no casualty and low cost incident, then company moral would really go down and pilots may become more tense and uncomfortable. This could lead to a lot of turn-over and other incidents because of the stress the company would lay on the pilots.
ReplyDeleteGood points about the over-hype. Do you all remember the incident several years back where Delta landed a B767(I think) on a taxiway in Atlanta? Possibly not, because it happened the day after the incident in which a plane overflew MSP. Talk about hazards...to me, a plane landing on a taxiway is equally as dangerous as landing at the wrong airport, yet there was very little media hype about this. Why? They didn't need the story that day.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOnce a pilot lands an aircraft like a 737 or 747 at the wrong airport it's pretty much game over. Passengers will need to be unloaded and a large amount of planning will need to take place before the aircraft is able to depart again. Therefore, duty time considerations and inadequate fuel won't really come into play in this scenario.
ReplyDeleteI agree that it was right for the pilots to be suspended, however I do not feel they should be fired in the situation if their was no intentional wrongdoing. It is necessary to suspend them while the investigation is taking place in order to determine exactly what happened.
First, love how we happen upon the same accident.
ReplyDeleteTalking about the regionals, its nuts that these guys get paid so little for what they do. Long hours, many takeoff and landings, yet they are paid worse then a Mcdonalds manager? How can we hold pilots accountable to making a mistake, when they make so little? Of course aviation has a high professional standard, and every one of us is held to that standard, but there is much room to be desired when it comes to judging pilots on mistakes, even ones that result in no damage or fatalities.
I like your thinking about the other, not so obvious implications that are a result of landing at the wrong airport. It is easy for people to take things for face value and not really think outside the box.
ReplyDeleteI also like the points you made about the world not being perfect and that there are going to be mistakes. It is very true! We need to start accepting these mistakes and just try to decrease them as much as possible and control them as well as we can.